Starting an ISO on Wisp that I'm not sure I'll finish, at least not now
Perhaps that's just tunnel vision on my end, but this looks like a very SvS interaction. It's like DM realized he could say something about his teammate without getting himself or his partner in trouble; it's like they're just toying with eachother lol. Even more importantly, DM
did not reply to this last post at all. He straight up ignored it. Now, if DM were actually town, would "ur claim was a meme" satisfy him? Let's say I harbor doubts xD. It really feels like DM wasn't actually worried about Wisp at all, which indicates scum theatre.
When asked to justify progression by Ultra (who is confirmed town).
I'm torn between saying the tone feels good and saying it's an easy escape from a difficult question lol. The D1 ISO has a lot of this attitude, and I'm not sure it's natural, but eh. In a vacuum, it's not particularly damning, but probably not towny either. see next quote
Answer to being told by Ultra that the previous post did not actually answer anything. Now I'm striking through what I wrote above, because that turns the carefree attitude into a suspiciously defensive one. Like, the town "I do w/e I want, and fuck you (kindly)" playstyle/attitude does exist in the world of mafia, but it's not matched by this very down-to-earth, not braggy answer. Scummy.
The saga continues xD. This is the kind of post I would have expected
directly after the one saying "I do whatever I want". Not right after a serious, defensive, but deflective answer. I don't buy it.
What the heck, Kuti was probably actually on the right track and we just failed to heed it lol. Like, they were absolutely seeing what I am now seeing in the earlier parts of the ISO, and Wisp kept not responding with an actual answer
The following three posts are all in immediate succession; they were posted back to back and appear as such in the thread.
"I'd vote DM just for this post"
"It's DM/Mac"
proceeds to fix the misspelled vote on Mac that was placed without an explanation before, the only explanation being "and I know why I'm doing this" in the reply to Kuti quoted above
Let's see if a DM vote actually ever appeared on D1...
Naked vote with an "explanation" that actually isn't one, replaced 47 posts later by:
.
This is relatively close to EoD. Wisp ended off-wagon with his vote on Kuti. There is no valid progression on DM to explain the switches. Instead, what we have is this:
I've already commented on this being scum theatre-y in a previous post. Like, what gaslighting? And how is DM's claim scummy in a vacuum on D1? And most importantly,
how does all of this explain the switch off to Mac, and then to Banana, and finally to Kuti? The progression simply doesn't add up.
End of Day 1.
And that's what happens on D2, where Kuti is pretty obviously getting lynched. "I scumread kuti but actually just vote DM because ?"... like, Wisp KNOWS it won't happen, he ADMITS IT lol. This is a perfect opportunity to park a vote on a scummate without risk. And again, progression? Why just move away from DM and Mac to end up on Banana and then Kuti at EoD1 if you actually think DM is the right call and end up going back to it on D2? It could be fine if there were a visible progression, but there absolutely isn't any.
Side note: where the heck does this come from:
DIDN'T YOU ALMOST WANT TO LYNCH HIM NOT LONG AGO XD
I'm stopping here for now, might be enough tbh. I am convinced. Wisp/DM/Arrow it is
@
macdougall
@
ikarusdk
@
Ultra
@
Stellaria
I feel like you should read this