I pray to god for a drink to see me through
pretend y‘all drinking now and thank you for your support on trying this game out im going to sleep now gn8
I Like Ice Cream
So, I’m really annoyed that you posted this. I don’t think it’s appropriate to use whether or not you were infracted for something as a potential defense in a FM game. Since I can obviously see whether or not you actually got infracted, I really don’t like this and I don’t know how to respond to it without ruining the game
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Rachyl is mayor, aamirus is mafia, gg ez we won
Look, he and I are counterclaiming each other right? So I’m already saying I’m town and he’s mafia and he’ll say the same about me. I think then that it doesn’t matter that he and I have some potential extra information about each other since we are counterclaiming each other anyway. I think the best thing to do is to leave it up in the air as to whether it happened or not. As him being double infracted like he said basically confirms him as stump and him being not infracted basically confirms him as mafia.
So, yea. I think not answering whether he was or was not is best for the sake of the game.
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Anyway, Kenny, here is how I’ll prove I’m the stump and not PTB. As the 12 hour mark approaches, I will be here, online, not in incognito mode or as a guest but with my account name showing. Then, with 5 minutes left, I will leave the page. You will still see that I am logged in on the site (meaning I’m not in incognito mode), but you won’t see me in the list of people reading the thread. This should prove that I have no intention of voting because I am not the mafioso.
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Not to mention that using site mechanics to prove a role is terrible play too
By making this u vs ptb I increased the town win chance to 50% btw.
Pretty good right
OH so you're the mafioso. That makes sense now. LOL.
Dang, sorry @Rachyl .
I'll state this again, and it's standard FM policy. Players are told when they're going to be infracted, however, the actual levying of infractions does not occur until the FM game concludes as to prevent staff members from being able to confirm shit or whatever.
But it doesn't really matter b/c you counterclaimed. So it's 100% confirmed to me that you're the scum.
@Kenny she does have a point though, you revealing citi could have had bad consequences rachyls lynch would have gone through. I would have thrown. Good thing I'm not allowed to vote, and there was a 12 hour safeguard.
Meta reading the host and players is not always the best move lol.
OPPS.
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
An infraction also does not prove any roles in any way. Aamirus claiming that gives me scum vibes.
Okay, moving on, it’s clear that you’re going to vote me right now so the only way I could win if I’m scum is to be there when it hits 12 hours and vote before you. I’m claiming that I will be visibly online and not in the thread at that time. Now, I could set my own timer and then try to quickly enter the thread and post right when the timer is up, but that still gives me a solid 10 second disadvantage over somebody who is already in the thread with their vote ready to be posted (time to load the page and to paste the vote into the reply box). I hope that you can make the right decision Kenny as Rachyl is probably AWOL. I understand that since you’re tunneled you are probably going to just chalk this up as me trying to get you to mislynch. But, consider that if I were mafia, and fairly confident that you were going to vote me, I would be more willing to take my chances with voting quickly than with convincing you to mislynch
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
If PTB is mafia, there would be zero reason for him to get an infraction as he’d be allowed to vote Rachyl. I don’t believe Efe had made it clear that we had to wait 12 hours to vote. Thus, the only way he’s getting one is if he is stump, since stump is not allowed to vote. This is straightforward and based on what the setup had in it before the game started.
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
I didn’t initially counterclaim you openly because it was better for town to NOT reveal roles and give away the mayor to the mafia. Kenny had already ruined that by hardclaiming citizen, yes, but I was hoping my nudging him about the setup could result in him unclaiming or better yet simply suggesting that he might be lying and actually be the mayor and give you some additional WIFOM to deal with
And you directly @ed me and said thanks Aamirus when first mentioning the “infraction” so you cannot pretend that I “started” this. You were directly trying to use it to GAIN townpoints as only a stump would get infracted for voting, and so every time you repeatedly assert that you received an infraction you are essentially claiming to be a confirmed stump.
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
Have you ever heard the tragedy of Darth Jar Jar the wise?
I said thanks because you called out the fact that I "broke the rules" and immediately after that I received two notifications. I was PM'd by another admin and efe stating I'd be punished after the game for 1. Voting. and 2. Voting during the black out timer.
Had I realized 1. I wasn't allowed to vote, or 2. The vote would go into effect even though there was supposed to be a restriction, i WOULD have never voted.
You're the only one here trying to claim anything anyone has said is for "town points"
All you've done is throw shade, and you didn't even hardclaim your role claim, you passively did it.
Ehh. I was hoping you'd be mayor, but it's clear you're not.